|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
title = "21st Century Robot: The Dr. Simon Egerton Stories - Brian David Johnson"
|
|
|
|
|
date = 2020-07-04
|
|
|
|
|
updated = 2021-02-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "david johnson", "robotics", "it", "stars:2",
|
|
|
|
|
"books:2020", "published:2014"]
|
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16087659-21st-century-robot):
|
|
|
|
|
When companies develop a new technology, do they ask how it might affect the
|
|
|
|
|
people who will actually use it? That, more or less, sums up Brian David
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson's duties as Intel's futurist-in-residence. In this fascinating book,
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson provides a collection of science fiction prototyping stories that
|
|
|
|
|
attempt to answer the question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=2) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a hard book to read. Not due its writing style or large paragraphs of
|
|
|
|
|
something of the kind, but because you have no idea what what is real and what
|
|
|
|
|
is not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are some stories about the "21st Century Robot Foundation", which is a
|
|
|
|
|
foundation to give free, open source access to robot designs and code. Problem
|
|
|
|
|
is, some of those are interleaved with fiction stories that has a character of
|
|
|
|
|
the same name of someone in the foundation and then you never know if that's a
|
|
|
|
|
cool extended thingy, actual coincidence or just plain... laziness (although I
|
|
|
|
|
reckon that's a strong word for this).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are some things that pissed me off. For example, saying "the robot brain
|
|
|
|
|
is the hardware and software, what we call artificial intelligence, or AI". AI
|
|
|
|
|
is way more than just hardware and software, you have to _train_ something to
|
|
|
|
|
make it an AI, or it is just a bunch of reactive code with not actual
|
|
|
|
|
"intelligence". Maybe it was dumbed down to reach the general population
|
|
|
|
|
instead of going with proper terms, but it just annoys people that _do_ know.
|
|
|
|
|
And talking about "apps to extend the robot personality" also seems a bit
|
|
|
|
|
far-fetched in how AI works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, maybe the idea is great and all, but ideas without backing facts are just
|
|
|
|
|
dreams. And for someone running a foundation, lacking the facts feels...
|
|
|
|
|
weird.
|
