|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
title = "The Flight of the Eisenstein - James Swallow"
|
|
|
|
|
date = 2020-01-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "horus heresy", "warhammer 40000", "sci",
|
|
|
|
|
"james swallow", "1 star"]
|
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/80155.The_Flight_of_the_Eisenstein):
|
|
|
|
|
Having witnessed the events on Istvaan III, Deathguard Captain Garro seizes a
|
|
|
|
|
ship and heads to Terra to warn the Emperor of Horus's treachery. But the
|
|
|
|
|
fleeing Eisenstein is damaged by enemy fire, and becomes stranded in the warp.
|
|
|
|
|
Can Garro and his men survive the depredations of Chaos and get his warning to
|
|
|
|
|
Terra in time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=1) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do you tell a following story that takes over from another one, one that
|
|
|
|
|
feels somewhat complete, one that, even when discussing several events, have
|
|
|
|
|
at least one that goes to conclusion? One solution is to continue the story
|
|
|
|
|
from the point the previous one completed, but one could try to push the
|
|
|
|
|
story further by picking one of those events and showing another point of
|
|
|
|
|
view of something readers already know how it will end, being careful to not
|
|
|
|
|
build any suspense on what will happen, 'cause the reader knows what it will
|
|
|
|
|
end and you end up with just a bunch of text that it is just boring as heck
|
|
|
|
|
to read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another thing one should take care is to not build long sentences that just
|
|
|
|
|
keeps going on and on that add very little except burn the reader time, like
|
|
|
|
|
pointing out that long sentences burn the reader time, instead of going
|
|
|
|
|
straight to the point, avoiding running around the point, with no care about
|
|
|
|
|
that amount of information per sentence you're adding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And, still, you get all those here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, from one of the several events that happened in "Galaxy in Flames",
|
|
|
|
|
the author picked on of the things that happens in the sidelines (which get
|
|
|
|
|
some spotlight, in the end) and try to build a whole story out of it, kind
|
|
|
|
|
like "Shadow of the Giant" is built on the side-story of Ender's Game. But
|
|
|
|
|
while Shadow of the Giant, while still entangled with Ender's Game, have very
|
|
|
|
|
small touching points, about 60% is exactly what happened in "Galaxy in
|
|
|
|
|
Flames". Worse, with so much touching surface, the author decided to create on
|
|
|
|
|
suspense on what will happen to the nominal ship: Will it survive the attack
|
|
|
|
|
from Horus forces? Will they manage to get away? OF COURSE IT WILL, Galaxy in
|
|
|
|
|
Flames told us that they escape, so why are you making a huge fuss about the
|
|
|
|
|
amount of damage they are taking, like they won't be able to take away?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And there is also the long sentences that provide very little information with
|
|
|
|
|
a huge amount of words, which completely break the speed of the story. Think
|
|
|
|
|
about the longest, most boring line, with the most duplicate information, in
|
|
|
|
|
the middle of a battle. How would you feel about the battle speed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honestly, it's not that "Horus Heresy" is a masterpiece of literature, but the
|
|
|
|
|
series could surely survive without this book.
|
