You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
50 lines
2.1 KiB
50 lines
2.1 KiB
3 years ago
|
+++
|
||
|
title = "The Manager's Answer Book - Barbara Mitchell, Cornelia Gamlem"
|
||
|
date = 2021-08-25
|
||
|
|
||
|
[taxonomies]
|
||
|
tags = ["reviews", "books", "books:2021", "management"]
|
||
|
+++
|
||
|
|
||
|
[OpenLibrary
|
||
|
Summary](https://openlibrary.org/books/OL28202958M/The_Manager%27s_Answer_Book):
|
||
|
Powerful Tools to Maximize Your Impact and Influence, Build Trust and Teams, and
|
||
|
Respond to Challenges
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- more -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
{{ stars(stars=2) }}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Honestly, I didn't finish reading the book.
|
||
|
|
||
|
First, the style of showing content by the way of questions doesn't quite fit
|
||
|
the way I read, specially when the questions are specially designed to provide
|
||
|
an answer -- and not the other way around.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Second, most of the answers are quite obvious, in the style "How can I manage
|
||
|
X?" with the answer "Ask the people who were doing it in the first". Well, duh.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Third, the question style is somewhat confusing. It uses the pattern of "I
|
||
|
read/saw/heard about X. What can I do about it?", with different styles of
|
||
|
X. There are even questions which one could almost say are non-sequiturs, like
|
||
|
(paraphrasing) "I'm a highly hands-on person, how can I write the reports the
|
||
|
financial team is asking me?". You can be both, and none of those two are
|
||
|
actually related.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fourth, there are a bunch of useless comments in the middle, which gives the
|
||
|
impression of filler, like "As a manager, you have to do several things." No
|
||
|
shit, Sherlock.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And fifth, by 75% of the book, there was a question about what one should report
|
||
|
and I quote "Evidence of union activity should be reported to your human
|
||
|
resources or legal support as soon as possible. Early detection of and rapid
|
||
|
response to union activity has long been key to union avoidance." So, if I get
|
||
|
this right, it means that me, as a manager, should be a union busting asshole?
|
||
|
Fuck. Off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
That's when I gave up. I was already tired of the style and then, instead of
|
||
|
suggesting speaking to people invested in it to check why they believe an union
|
||
|
is necessary or what could be done to avoid the creation of the union in the
|
||
|
first place. But no, you must report to legal so they can burst the whole thing
|
||
|
down. Great, what a great person you've become.
|