The source content for blog.juliobiason.me
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
title = "Things I Learnt The Hard Way - Don't Defend Bad Code"
|
|
|
|
|
date = 2019-07-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "things i learnt", "personal", "bad code", "defend"]
|
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad code exists everywhere. You shouldn't defend it, even if it is your own
|
|
|
|
|
code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad code isn't bad on purpose. It sadly happens. But because it is bad, you
|
|
|
|
|
shouldn't defend it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, an application does whatever you need. But it crashes from time
|
|
|
|
|
to time. Software shouldn't crash and you shouldn't defend it just because it
|
|
|
|
|
does whatever you need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your internal application works on a single browser. That's bad. "But maybe
|
|
|
|
|
the other devs thought it wouldn't be worth working on all browsers". No. It
|
|
|
|
|
is _bad_. You shouldn't defend the other devs because they decided to focus on
|
|
|
|
|
a single browser due whatever problems they were facing. Sure it wasn't nice
|
|
|
|
|
that they had to do this trade-off, but it is still _bad_ software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we keep defending this kind of software, we will still get bad software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ chapters(prev_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/own-your-shit", prev_chapter_title="Own Your Shit") }}
|
