|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
title = "All You Need Is Kill - Hiroshi Sakurazaka"
|
|
|
|
date = 2014-12-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "hiroshi sakurazaka", "reviews", "scifi", "4 stars"]
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6255949-all-you-need-is-kill):
|
|
|
|
When the alien Gitai invade, Keiji Kiriya is just one of many raw recruits
|
|
|
|
shoved into a suit of battle armor and sent out to kill. Keiji dies on the
|
|
|
|
battlefield, only to find himself reborn each morning to fight and die again
|
|
|
|
and again. On the 158th iteration though, he sees something different,
|
|
|
|
something out of place: the female soldier known as the Bitch of War. Is the
|
|
|
|
Bitch the key to Keiji’s escape, or to his final death?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I admit I got this book because of "Edge of Tomorrow", which I watched before
|
|
|
|
reading the book. As usual, only the concept of the story is the same in both.
|
|
|
|
Apart from "soldier keeps repeating the same day over and over again due alien
|
|
|
|
technology", there is absolutely nothing in common with the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The story starts slowly, mostly because Keiji Kiriya is still a fresh guy. But
|
|
|
|
he still kills one special alien and gains temporal superpowers. When that
|
|
|
|
happens, the story picks up and it's really hard to drop it. Then the story
|
|
|
|
stops to tell the backstory of Rita Vrataski and the pace drops a bit; then it
|
|
|
|
goes back to the fight and it picks up again. That's probably how I read this
|
|
|
|
thing so fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a way, the book is more brutal than the movie, as much as "Jarhead" the
|
|
|
|
book is more brutal than "Jarhead" the movie. Also, the explanation for the
|
|
|
|
"time travel" -- which in the book is no time travel at all, being much more
|
|
|
|
akin to the way Kitty Pride sends people in the time in "X-Men: Days of Future
|
|
|
|
Past" -- seems much more plausible than the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a short but interesting story, nonetheless.
|