|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
title = "Moon Shot: The Inside Story of America's Race to the Moon - Alan Shepard"
|
|
|
|
|
date = 2018-12-28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
|
tags = ["en-us", "alan shepard", "book", "reviews", "nasa", "apollo",
|
|
|
|
|
"0 stars"]
|
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37711959-moon-shot):
|
|
|
|
|
The never-before-told story of the courage, dedication, and teamwork that made
|
|
|
|
|
the journey to the moon possible--an intense human drama of the sacrifices and
|
|
|
|
|
risks asked of a remarkable group of astronauts. Shepard and Slayton, part of
|
|
|
|
|
the pioneering space program from the beginning, tell this fascinating inside
|
|
|
|
|
story. 32 pages of photos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=0) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm giving this book no stars because it deserves none.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, the writing style is terrible. At the very start, the way the
|
|
|
|
|
author writes makes you wonder if this is really a book about history or if it
|
|
|
|
|
is plain fiction. There are ways to write about historic events -- and I don't
|
|
|
|
|
mean you can't go a little overboard while writing about it -- but the way the
|
|
|
|
|
story is told is more akin to fiction than actual reporting of events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second, this is as "MURRICA!" as a book can get. All American events are
|
|
|
|
|
described as passionate as possible, while Russian events -- you know, the guys
|
|
|
|
|
who put a man in space before the US and who did a spacewalk before the US --
|
|
|
|
|
as described as plain as possible. This gets to the point that, at the first
|
|
|
|
|
half of the book, events are timed after American successes and Russian
|
|
|
|
|
failures; it gets to the incredible insensitive point when talking about Apollo
|
|
|
|
|
15 and the moonbuggy and how it was easier to carry stuff on the moon compared
|
|
|
|
|
to the Apollo 14 mission (which is probably the longest part of the book, even
|
|
|
|
|
supplanting the Apollo 11, the first mission to reach the moon) and, oh, 3
|
|
|
|
|
Russians died a bit before -- mentioned as a simple "matter of fact" than an
|
|
|
|
|
actual accident and something that shouldn't happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying "Yeah, Russians are part of the Apollo mission" 'cause that
|
|
|
|
|
would be stupid, but JFK said the space missions were a mission to humanity and
|
|
|
|
|
even Neil Armstrong said reaching the moon was a giant leap for mankind, but
|
|
|
|
|
this book takes "humanity" and throws out of the window. 'Cause the important
|
|
|
|
|
stuff is that American win and Russians lose and fuck Russians, amirite? (That
|
|
|
|
|
was sarcastic, in case you didn't noticed.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the last chapter is purely political instead of focusing on history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the whole book was Alan Shepard telling his side of the history -- and
|
|
|
|
|
focusing on *that* instead of going all the way to the points where
|
|
|
|
|
Shepard had no interaction with -- then yeah, it could be a reasonably good
|
|
|
|
|
book. But the way it is told, it's Alan Shepard story hidden in a bunch of
|
|
|
|
|
other stuff.
|
