The source content for blog.juliobiason.me
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

63 lines
1.9 KiB

+++
title = "Subterranean Scalzi Super Bundle - John Scalzi"
date = 2015-03-20
[taxonomies]
tags = ["books", "john scalzi", "reviews", "scifi", "3 stars"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16157467-subterranean-scalzi-super-bundle):
Subterranean Press bundles together all of their John Scalzi titles into one easy-to-buy special this November:
How I Proposed To My Wife: An Alien Sex Story
An Election
Judge Sn Goes Golfing
Questions for a Soldier
The Sagan Diary
The Tale of the Wicked
The God Engines
You're Not fooling Anyone When You Take Your Laptop to the Coffee Shop
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=3) }}
**the stories are good, the blog posts, not so much**
This is a book on five acts.
The first act you have the stories. In this act, "The Diary of Jane Sagan" and
"God Machines" are going to get stuck in your head, 'cause they are pretty
excellent stories.
The second act are blog posts, which are meh.
The third act is a single story, which is ok.
The fourth act are more blog posts, which manages to be more Boeing than the
ones in the second act.
The fifth act are unused chapters from "Lock In". They are probably good, if
you read the published story.
Now, while the stories are good, the fact that 70% of the book are blog posts
is a real let down, mostly because I think blog posts are boring. Sure, there
are exceptions to this rule, like Wil Weathon's book, in which he just don't
put the posts, but actually put some background about them. For Scalzi, there
is no such reflections and most of the posts are not even interesting, 'cause
they are temporal or regional (like elections and things related to the USA).
After a while, I just skipped most of them.
Is it a worth book? Hard to answer. If I had only the stories and no blog
posts, that would be awesome, but the posts just make the book longer without
the need for such.