|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
title = "Geek Wisdom: The Sacred Teachings of Nerd Culture - Stephen H. Segal, N.K. Jemisin, Eric San Juan, Genevieve Valentine, Zaki Hasan"
|
|
|
|
|
date = 2020-03-10
|
|
|
|
|
updated = 2021-02-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "fun", "stephen h segal", "n k jemisin",
|
|
|
|
|
"eric san juan", "genevieve valentine", "zaki hasan", "stars:1",
|
|
|
|
|
"books:2020", "published:2011"]
|
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10418415-geek-wisdom):
|
|
|
|
|
Computer nerds are our titans of industry; comic-book superheroes are our
|
|
|
|
|
Hollywood idols; the Internet is our night on the town. Clearly, geeks know
|
|
|
|
|
something about life in the 21st century that other folks don’t—something we
|
|
|
|
|
all can learn from. Geek Wisdom takes as gospel some 200 of the most powerful
|
|
|
|
|
and oft-cited quotes from movies (“Where we’re going, we don’t need roads”),
|
|
|
|
|
television (“Now we know—and knowing is half the battle”), literature (“All
|
|
|
|
|
that is gold does not glitter”), games, science, the Internet, and more. Now
|
|
|
|
|
these beloved pearls of modern-day culture have been painstakingly interpreted
|
|
|
|
|
by a diverse team of hardcore nerds with their imaginations turned up to 11.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this collection of mini-essays is by, for, and about geeks—but it’s just
|
|
|
|
|
so surprisingly profound, the rest of us would have to be dorks not to read
|
|
|
|
|
it. So say we all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=1) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although it is getting common in my reviews, I have to say this again: I have
|
|
|
|
|
no idea what's the target of this book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everything starts with a quote: A scientist, a meme, a movie quote, a game
|
|
|
|
|
character, take your "geek" pick". Then, it is followed by a commentary about
|
|
|
|
|
the quote. And, finally, some piece of trivia/explanation about the quote
|
|
|
|
|
itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The content of the book, then, is the commentary about the quotes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And that's where my confusion comes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some explanations seem targeted to other geeks: "You see, So-And-So says this,
|
|
|
|
|
so we geek should be careful about that". Some others seem targeted to
|
|
|
|
|
non-geeks: "Geeks love So-And-So, because they said that and geeks related to
|
|
|
|
|
it". So, it's a book to geeks or to non-geeks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No only that, but some explanations are really dense, like the author (one of
|
|
|
|
|
them) is trying to push a point in a short form and throwing jumping stones
|
|
|
|
|
really fast, to the point that when you reach the end of the paragraph, you
|
|
|
|
|
have no idea how it started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And some are borderline insane: "Transformers! Transform and roll out!" is
|
|
|
|
|
related to Martin Luther King "Change does not roll in on the wheels of
|
|
|
|
|
inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle." And with that all I can
|
|
|
|
|
think is "Really? Like, really really?!?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the end, it is just a book about geeky quotes and a lot of filler.
|
