|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
title = "The Ghost Brigades (Old Man's War, #2) - John Scalzi"
|
|
|
|
date = 2016-04-21
|
|
|
|
updated = 2021-02-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[taxonomies]
|
|
|
|
tags = ["books", "john scalzi", "reviews", "scifi", "old man's war",
|
|
|
|
"stars:5", "published:2006"]
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/239399.The_Ghost_Brigades):
|
|
|
|
The Ghost Brigades are the Special Forces of the Colonial Defense Forces,
|
|
|
|
elite troops created from the DNA of the dead and turned into the perfect
|
|
|
|
soldiers for the CDF's toughest operations. They’re young, they’re fast and
|
|
|
|
strong, and they’re totally without normal human qualms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The universe is a dangerous place for humanity—and it's about to become far
|
|
|
|
more dangerous. Three races that humans have clashed with before have allied
|
|
|
|
to halt our expansion into space. Their linchpin: the turncoat military
|
|
|
|
scientist Charles Boutin, who knows the CDF’s biggest military secrets. To
|
|
|
|
prevail, the CDF must find out why Boutin did what he did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ stars(stars=5) }}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading another "Old Man's War" after a long time since the very first is a
|
|
|
|
weird experience. Mostly because you forgot half of the stuff, and the other
|
|
|
|
half is buried somewhere in a fuzzy old memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And then the names appear in the story. And *then* you remember most of the
|
|
|
|
stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thing is, this book does very little connection with the first one. While
|
|
|
|
"_Old Man's War_" explored the life of a man in a new body in a very long
|
|
|
|
battle, this book focuses on the other half of the book, Jane Sagan, the
|
|
|
|
soldier built with the DNA of the man in the new body.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So now we have the battles of Jane Sagan as a CDF soldier. But the book is
|
|
|
|
really what *people* are: The bodies? Their personality? Their memories?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it doesn't go as deep as it could in this topic but, on the
|
|
|
|
other hand, the story is mostly solid, the writing is easy to read and the
|
|
|
|
story itself have a good pacing.
|