diff --git a/content/books/things-i-learnt/steps-as-comments/index.md b/content/books/things-i-learnt/steps-as-comments/index.md
index e48c74b..56b52c7 100644
--- a/content/books/things-i-learnt/steps-as-comments/index.md
+++ b/content/books/things-i-learnt/steps-as-comments/index.md
@@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ writing the code between the comments, you write the functionality in the
 function themselves and keep a clean view of what your application does in the
 main code.
 
+In [A Comment Is An Invitation For
+Refactoring](https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/a-comment-is-an-invitation-for-refactoring/),
+Gergely Orosz points that comments in the code could be converted to function
+calls, including things like grouping common things, or bugfixes. This is,
+basically, the same thing, except in different points of development: One when
+the code is about to be written and one when the code is already there.
+
 [^1]: Yes, that was sarcastic.
 
 {{ chapters(prev_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/spec-first", prev_chapter_title="Specs First, Then Code", next_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/gherkin", next_chapter_title="Gherkin Is Your Friend to Understand Expectations") }}
diff --git a/content/reviews/books/301-smart-answers-to-though-interview-questions.md b/content/reviews/books/301-smart-answers-to-though-interview-questions.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1cbd5ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/reviews/books/301-smart-answers-to-though-interview-questions.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
++++
+title = "301 Smart Answers To Though Interview Questions - Vicky Oliver"
+date = 2019-11-24
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["en-au", "books", "reviews", "interviews", "vicky oliver"]
++++
+
+[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/287009.301_Smart_Answers_to_Tough_Interview_Questions):
+In today's job market, how you perform in an interview can make or break your
+hiring possibilities. If you want to stand a head above the rest of the pack,
+301 Smart Answers to Tough Interview Questions is the definitive guide you need
+to the real, and sometimes quirky, questions employers are using to weed out
+candidates.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+{{ stars(stars=1) }}
+
+I have to be honest and say that I dropped the reading of this half-way through
+it.
+
+Right out of the bad, the author warns that one shouldn't simply repeat the
+answers she's giving here, but put it their (the reader) own twist. And she
+does a good thing by adding, after the answer, some tips around the answer
+itself: why it works, what you shouldn't do, why such questions are asked...
+
+But not every single answer have an explanation. They are there by themselves,
+which makes a bit hard to put your own twist on them if you don't have any
+pointers on why it works.
+
+Also, so answers are simply... to hard to agree with. For example, if you have
+kids and the interviewer asks if you had any problem staying up late working,
+the answer is around the lines of "Fuck no. Fuck my kids. I love work. Go
+work!" Not on those terms, but the interviewer is basically asking if you would
+mind letting go of your time with your kids and you should answer "sure, fine"?
+Obviously, you're trying to get that job, but what would happen if you say
+something like "I don't mind staying late working instead of seeing my kids"
+only to, months later, have your boss pissing on your hear for going home early
+'cause one of your kids is sick? Are you going to answer "but it was my kid,
+and they were sick!"? That's not what you said in the interview...
+
+Obviously, there are things you can do to doing fine in an interview, but I
+guess lying is not one of those.