Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 60 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "The Escort (2015)" |
||||
date = 2021-02-03 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["movies", "reviews", "comedy", "movies:2021"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[Wikipedia Summary](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Escort_(2015_film)): |
||||
|
||||
Journalist Mitch is a sex addict. When he is fired, he applies for a job with a |
||||
magazine. The editor promises to hire him if he writes a more interesting |
||||
article than his competitors. He decides to write about Natalie, a |
||||
Stanford-educated escort he met by chance. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||
|
||||
Honestly, I'm not even sure this should be a 2-star movie. I mean, look at the |
||||
plot: It's some guy and a escort and they start going together. Do you have a |
||||
feeling this would end up like [Pretty |
||||
Woman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Woman)? Heck, this is even mentioned |
||||
in the movie, by Natalie/Victoria, asking if Mitch thinks this would end up like |
||||
the (other) movie. |
||||
|
||||
Well, it does, and the quip in the movie doesn't do anything to soften the |
||||
slouch of clichés in the movie: Surely the guy who doesn't get attached to |
||||
anyone will get attached to the girl; surely the girl will rethink her |
||||
profession and only then will consider going into a relationship; surely |
||||
something will change in the girls life to make her get out of her job; surely |
||||
the attraction between them would make the guy rethink his addiction; surely |
||||
after that his relationship to those around him will get a 180 degree turn to |
||||
the best. |
||||
|
||||
But the thing is... I have a crush on Lyndsy Fonseca. Not just she's pretty, her |
||||
acting doesn't look like acting. OK, it's not Donald Sutherland level of acting |
||||
but heck, the way she speaks feels like some real person, in whatever situation |
||||
she's in, speaking. It's not from this movie, but even in Kick-Ass it was pretty |
||||
damn good. There is a scene when Mitch tells, among other things, that Natalie |
||||
is pretty and she quips back "Oh, you think I'm pretty?" in a juvenile/childish |
||||
way that feels incredible natural. And that's why it is not just a single star. |
||||
|
||||
Michael Doneger, Fonseca's pair, on the other hand, it is pretty hard |
||||
case. Personally -- and I'm saying this as a movie-watcher, not a movie-critic, |
||||
something that I'm not -- I can't see his acting being that good, but also the |
||||
lines feed to him -- which, apparently, were also written by him -- seem forced |
||||
and not that much natural. Sure the chemistry with Fonseca work, but the |
||||
character itself is not that good. |
||||
|
||||
In the end, I guess the movie could distance itself from "Pretty Woman" by |
||||
simply not going that road: Make Mitch still be a sex addict; make Natalie still |
||||
be an escort; let their friendship/relationship not get into what the characters |
||||
are. I mean, there is something in a scene where the two are discussing clinics |
||||
for STDs and their posters. Let it continue from there. They could even keep the |
||||
relationship while keeping their problems/jobs. Make |
||||
something... different. Challenge the status quo that a relationship can't work |
||||
if one side is a sex addict and the other a hooker. |
||||
|
||||
It's not a boring movie, it's just... bland. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue