Julio Biason
4 years ago
2 changed files with 81 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "The 7 Secrets of Exceptional Leadership - Brian Tracy" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-05-24 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "leadership", "brian tracy"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18523862-the-7-secrets-of-exceptional-leadership): |
||||||
|
In The Seven Secrets of Exceptional Leadership Brian describes the most |
||||||
|
important leadership qualities practiced by top leaders worldwide. By |
||||||
|
committing yourself to these seven "secrets" of exceptional leadership, you |
||||||
|
can achieve all your goals as a leader in every area of your life. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=0) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok, I have to say that this book rubbed me in all the wrong ways. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
First, more pictures than content. I mean, if I want to have a book about |
||||||
|
boats, I'd get a book about boats, not about leadership. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Second, the rules are somewhat weird. "A leader must know themselves" I can |
||||||
|
get behind, specially because one would have to know their own weaknesses to |
||||||
|
lead people. "Know what they want"... why? A leader may lead people to make |
||||||
|
things they (leader) don't even fully agree, but know it must be done. Just |
||||||
|
knowing what you want (even couple with the other points) doesn't make you a |
||||||
|
leader -- heck, it doesn't even _fit_ the description of a leader. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This was a book that I picked up and dropped next day 'cause fuck confusing |
||||||
|
"being a boss" with "being a leader" -- and those two are completelly |
||||||
|
different aspects. |
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "In Fury Born - David Weber" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-06-20 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "review", "scifi", "fantasy"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/130528.In_Fury_Born): |
||||||
|
Imperial Intelligence couldn't find them, the Imperial Fleet couldn't catch |
||||||
|
them, and local defenses couldn't stop them. It seemed the planet-wrecking |
||||||
|
pirates were invincible. But they made a big mistake when they raided |
||||||
|
ex-commando leader Alicia DeVries' quiet home work, tortured and murdered her |
||||||
|
family, and then left her for dead. Alicia decided to turn "pirate" herself, |
||||||
|
and stole a cutting-edge AI ship from the Empire to start her vendetta. Her |
||||||
|
fellow veterans think she's gone crazy, the Imperial Fleet has shoot-on-sight |
||||||
|
orders. And of course the pirates want her dead, too. But Alicia DeVries has |
||||||
|
two allies nobody knows about, allies as implacable as she is: a self-aware |
||||||
|
computer, and a creature from the mists of Old Earth's most ancient legends. |
||||||
|
And this trio of furies won't rest until vengeance is served. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=1) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- (--) The beginning of the book puts a lot of backstory, all in the wrong |
||||||
|
places: You're in the middle of a conversation, the conversation stops, a |
||||||
|
lot of stuff is thrown at your face and... the conversation just |
||||||
|
continues. Where did you stop? What where they were discussing? |
||||||
|
- (--) In between backstories, there is a bunch of characters. Characters and |
||||||
|
more characters are thrown in the story, perform something small, |
||||||
|
disappear for a while, and suddenly appear again and who the heck was |
||||||
|
that? Did they mentioned them before? Worse, some names are so close you |
||||||
|
don't even know if it is a new character or an old one. |
||||||
|
- (-) The first battles are too long and provide nothing about the future. |
||||||
|
- (--) I don't have a problem with mixing scifi with fantasy, |
||||||
|
but you have to build an universe for that (sad to say, but something akin |
||||||
|
to "[Bright](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5519340/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1)"), but |
||||||
|
when you suddenly add a Greek spirit... everything seems to fall apart. |
||||||
|
- (+) Some points are really well constructed. For example, there is a |
||||||
|
discussion between three characters and you don't need descriptions to |
||||||
|
know who's talking; their tone and words make things clear. |
||||||
|
- (=) The pacing only gets convincing the end, when everything is done. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Honestly, it could be a good story, if the spirit was removed, the backstories |
||||||
|
cleaned out, some stuff that doesn't affect anything in the long run (pointing |
||||||
|
that they happened, with short summary would suffice) and make it shorter |
||||||
|
would be a real improvement. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue