Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 34 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = " Learn you some Erlang for great good! - Fred Hebert" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-10-25 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "it", "erlang", "fred hebert", "4 stars", |
||||||
|
"2020 challenge"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6718693-learn-you-some-erlang-for-great-good): |
||||||
|
(No Summary) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Another Erlang book for my collection. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This one takes its time to explain every point. So if you like to go fast and |
||||||
|
furious, that's not it. Also, because I read some other books (ok, "book") |
||||||
|
about Erlang, some topics felt a little bit boring, 'cause I did get the point |
||||||
|
already. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Also, it seems this books also suffer from the "let me use the shell to explain |
||||||
|
this point". It's not that bad when you want to show a point in the very |
||||||
|
beginning and then just drop it ('cause, you know, you won't use the shell as |
||||||
|
part of your application -- you may use as a helper to figure out when things |
||||||
|
go haywire, but not as a default tool) but not when you're near the middle of |
||||||
|
the book explaining some important topic, like supervisors. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But, at the same time, some topics that the other books (ok, "book") completely |
||||||
|
ignored, like "how do you build, package and deploy an Erlang application". |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But yeah, the "using shell for important stuff" *really* annoyed me. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue