Browse Source

a few missing book reviews

master
Julio Biason 5 years ago
parent
commit
62d9670da8
  1. 38
      content/reviews/books/greek-mythology-explained.md
  2. 35
      content/reviews/books/modern-vim-craft-your-development-environment-with-vim8-and-neovim.md
  3. 53
      content/reviews/books/moon-shot-the-inside-story-of-americas-race-to-the-moon.md

38
content/reviews/books/greek-mythology-explained.md

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+++
title = "Greek Mythology Explained: A Deeper Look at Classical Greek Lore and Myth - Marios Christou, David Ramenah"
date = 2019-01-05
[taxonomies]
tags = ["en-au", "book", "reviews", "greek mythology", "marios christou", "david ramenah"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/41822694-greek-mythology-explained):
Greek mythology explored like never before.
Fans of George R.R Martin’s A Song of Ice & Fire series and the Game of Thrones
TV series will love Greek Mythology Explained, a unique retelling of Greek
mythological tales featuring love, betrayal, murder and ruthless ambitions.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=4) }}
When I saw "Explained" in the title, I thought the explanations would point
things in the stories that reflected things in the Greek society at the time.
But no, explanations are way more simpler than that.
For example, the mith of Odysseus and his voyage back home, starting when he
has to choose between facing Scylla or Chyrabdis, one a monster of 6 heads and
another a huge whirlpool. The explanation: "between a rock and hard place". I
mean, it doesn't take much to realize that either option is terrible. You don't
need explanation for that.
On the other hand, some explanations are, actually, explanations about the
chosen story. Some characters in Greek mythology have different narrations for
the same story -- for example, there are, according to the book, 6 different
tales of Artemis and Orion, all with the same start, the same ending, but
different content "in between". This is nice.
And, even if the explanations aren't a huge thing, the select stories are
pretty good.

35
content/reviews/books/modern-vim-craft-your-development-environment-with-vim8-and-neovim.md

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+++
title = "Modern Vim: Craft Your Development Environment with Vim 8 and Neovim - Drew Neil"
date = 2018-12-29
[taxonomies]
tags = ["en-au", "books", "reviews", "vim", "drew neil"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36517607-modern-vim):
Turn Vim into a full-blown development environment using Vim 8’s new features
and this sequel to the beloved bestseller Practical Vim. Integrate your editor
with tools for building, testing, linting, indexing, and searching your
codebase. Discover the future of Vim with Neovim: a fork of Vim that includes
a built-in terminal emulator that will transform your workflow. Whether you
choose to switch to Neovim or stick with Vim 8, you’ll be a better developer.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=4) }}
I'll be honest and say that I did expect a bit more about this book.
It is not a book talking about changes in the last few years in the VIM
workflow; it's more about the changes in the ecosystem of VIM. So instead of
focusing on new features (say, from last version and current version), it
focuses a lot more on plugins.
Not that focusing on (recent) plugins is a bad thing: There were changes in the
infrastructure of VIM that allowed the creation of more modern and flexible
plugins and talking about them is a good thing. But, again, I expected a more
focused book on VIM than plugins. If the title were "Craft your VIM environment
on VIM 8 and Neovim", it would fit perfectly on what the book presents, for
example.
In all, it's not a bad book, although it requires that you know VIM beforehand.

53
content/reviews/books/moon-shot-the-inside-story-of-americas-race-to-the-moon.md

@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+++
title = "Moon Shot: The Inside Story of America's Race to the Moon - Alan Shepard"
date = 2018-12-28
[taxonomies]
tags = ["en-us", "alan shepard", "book", "review", "nasa", "apollo"]
+++
[GoodReads summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37711959-moon-shot):
The never-before-told story of the courage, dedication, and teamwork that made
the journey to the moon possible--an intense human drama of the sacrifices and
risks asked of a remarkable group of astronauts. Shepard and Slayton, part of
the pioneering space program from the beginning, tell this fascinating inside
story. 32 pages of photos.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=0) }}
I'm giving this book no stars because it deserves none.
First of all, the writing style is terrible. At the very start, the way the
author writes makes you wonder if this is really a book about history or if it
is plain fiction. There are ways to write about historic events -- and I don't
mean you can't go a little overboard while writing about it -- but the way the
story is told is more akin to fiction than actual reporting of events.
Second, this is as "MURRICA!" as a book can get. All American events are
described as passionate as possible, while Russian events -- you know, the guys
who put a man in space before the US and who did a spacewalk before the US --
as described as plain as possible. This gets to the point that, at the first
half of the book, events are timed after American successes and Russian
failures; it gets to the incredible insensitive point when talking about Apollo
15 and the moonbuggy and how it was easier to carry stuff on the moon compared
to the Apollo 14 mission (which is probably the longest part of the book, even
supplanting the Apollo 11, the first mission to reach the moon) and, oh, 3
Russians died a bit before -- mentioned as a simple "matter of fact" than an
actual accident and something that shouldn't happen.
I'm not saying "Yeah, Russians are part of the Apollo mission" 'cause that
would be stupid, but JFK said the space missions were a mission to humanity and
even Neil Armstrong said reaching the moon was a giant leap for mankind, but
this book takes "humanity" and throws out of the window. 'Cause the important
stuff is that American win and Russians lose and fuck Russians, amirite? (That
was sarcastic, in case you didn't noticed.)
And the last chapter is purely political instead of focusing on history.
If the whole book was Alan Shepard telling his side of the history -- and
focusing on *that* instead of going all the way to the points where
Shepard had no interaction with -- then yeah, it could be a reasonably good
book. But the way it is told, it's Alan Shepard story hidden in a bunch of
other stuff.
Loading…
Cancel
Save