Julio Biason
5 years ago
2 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Creating Interfaces with Bulma - Jeremy Thomas, Oleksii Potiekhin, Mikko Lauhakari, Aslam Shah, Dave Berning" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-01-20 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "bulma", "it"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38473029-creating-interfaces-with-bulma): |
||||||
|
This book is a step-by-step guide that will teach how to build a web interface |
||||||
|
from scratch using Bulma. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Everybody is looking for that most awesome, small CSS framework, that will |
||||||
|
solve all your problems. Is Bulma this framework? Well, I'm not sure. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It's not that the book doesn't show what the framework can do, it's just that |
||||||
|
the examples seem really without any checking: Sometimes fields are surrounded |
||||||
|
by one "field" div, sometimes they are surrounded by "column" (a normal grid |
||||||
|
component) and sometimes they are surrounded by two "field" divs. Why? Which |
||||||
|
one is the right way? It is a problem with the framework or a problem with the |
||||||
|
book? |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Also, there is a weird example of just writing templates with no explanation |
||||||
|
on why: Why one should replace "6 books" to "3 customers"? Does that change |
||||||
|
anything? (It does not, I do understand the why doing it, but there is no |
||||||
|
explanation that you're doing it just to show how things will look like.) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Also also, there is some serious problem with the images in the ePub version: |
||||||
|
It says something but it shows a copy of a previous image. Surely, you get |
||||||
|
what they meant by some template changes in a way that you don't need to see |
||||||
|
the results, but still... |
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "The Flight of the Eisenstein - James Swallow" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-01-17 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "horus heresy", "warhammer 40000", "sci", "james swallow"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/80155.The_Flight_of_the_Eisenstein): |
||||||
|
Having witnessed the events on Istvaan III, Deathguard Captain Garro seizes a |
||||||
|
ship and heads to Terra to warn the Emperor of Horus's treachery. But the |
||||||
|
fleeing Eisenstein is damaged by enemy fire, and becomes stranded in the warp. |
||||||
|
Can Garro and his men survive the depredations of Chaos and get his warning to |
||||||
|
Terra in time? |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=1) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
How do you tell a following story that takes over from another one, one that |
||||||
|
feels somewhat complete, one that, even when discussing several events, have |
||||||
|
at least one that goes to conclusion? One solution is to continue the story |
||||||
|
from the point the previous one completed, but one could try to push the |
||||||
|
story further by picking one of those events and showing another point of |
||||||
|
view of something readers already know how it will end, being careful to not |
||||||
|
build any suspense on what will happen, 'cause the reader knows what it will |
||||||
|
end and you end up with just a bunch of text that it is just boring as heck |
||||||
|
to read. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Another thing one should take care is to not build long sentences that just |
||||||
|
keeps going on and on that add very little except burn the reader time, like |
||||||
|
pointing out that long sentences burn the reader time, instead of going |
||||||
|
straight to the point, avoiding running around the point, with no care about |
||||||
|
that amount of information per sentence you're adding. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And, still, you get all those here. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Indeed, from one of the several events that happened in "Galaxy in Flames", |
||||||
|
the author picked on of the things that happens in the sidelines (which get |
||||||
|
some spotlight, in the end) and try to build a whole story out of it, kind |
||||||
|
like "Shadow of the Giant" is built on the side-story of Ender's Game. But |
||||||
|
while Shadow of the Giant, while still entangled with Ender's Game, have very |
||||||
|
small touching points, about 60% is exactly what happened in "Galaxy in |
||||||
|
Flames". Worse, with so much touching surface, the author decided to create on |
||||||
|
suspense on what will happen to the nominal ship: Will it survive the attack |
||||||
|
from Horus forces? Will they manage to get away? OF COURSE IT WILL, Galaxy in |
||||||
|
Flames told us that they escape, so why are you making a huge fuss about the |
||||||
|
amount of damage they are taking, like they won't be able to take away? |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And there is also the long sentences that provide very little information with |
||||||
|
a huge amount of words, which completely break the speed of the story. Think |
||||||
|
about the longest, most boring line, with the most duplicate information, in |
||||||
|
the middle of a battle. How would you feel about the battle speed? |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Honestly, it's not that "Horus Heresy" is a masterpiece of literature, but the |
||||||
|
series could surely survive without this book. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue