Julio Biason
4 years ago
2 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
transparent = true |
||||
title = "Movie Reviews" |
||||
+++ |
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "Ad Astra (2019)" |
||||
date = 2020-11-01 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["reviews", "movies", "2019", "brad pitt", "tommy lee jones", |
||||
"donald sutherland"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[IMDB Summary](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2935510/): |
||||
Astronaut Roy McBride undertakes a mission across an unforgiving solar system |
||||
to uncover the truth about his missing father and his doomed expedition that |
||||
now, 30 years later, threatens the universe. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||
|
||||
I remember some friends saying that "The movie looks like sci-fi, but it |
||||
isn't", but I have to say, it *is* sci-fi. It's not classic sci-fi, in which |
||||
they use some futuristic/scientific-based upgrades to explore some other topics |
||||
-- Star Trek is a classic in doing this. But this movie does a whole *metaphor* |
||||
using sci-fi. |
||||
|
||||
One of the curious aspects is that they managed to make old actors look like |
||||
old people. Tommy Lee looks old. Donald Sutherland looks old. Even Brad Pitt |
||||
looks somewhat older than me (well, *almost* older than me). Gone are the days |
||||
of 51-year-old Tom Cruise looked like 30-something in "Oblivion". No, Brad Pitt |
||||
character looks 40-almost-50, Tommy Lee looks like the father or someone |
||||
40-almost-50 and Donald Sutherland looks like the colleague of that father. It |
||||
is a nice change, though. |
||||
|
||||
The visuals are impressive, almost "Gravity" quality. The space elevator/power |
||||
generator looks like a real thing. I almost got pissed in that intro 'cause it |
||||
seemed they forgot something, but then things happen and I wasn't that pissed |
||||
anymore. |
||||
|
||||
The movie pacing is weird. There are not speed ups and no speed downs, but the |
||||
whole thing moves like a crawl, to the point of boredom. I could watch |
||||
something on my phone during the movie (I watched at home, not in the cinema, |
||||
don't worry) and I didn't lose anything, in the end. |
||||
|
||||
And, speaking of the end, that's when the whole metaphor downs to you. But |
||||
then, you're tired of the crawling pacing and it feels really "meh". |
||||
|
||||
I may watch again for the visuals, but would probably switch channels in some |
||||
less visually appealing scene and get lost in some other movie. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue