Julio Biason
4 years ago
2 changed files with 70 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
transparent = true |
||||
title = "Series Reviews" |
||||
+++ |
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "American Playboy: The Hugh Hefner Story" |
||||
date = 2020-11-05 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["reviews", "series", "playboy", "amazon", "hugh hefner"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[IMDB Summary](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5968748/?ref_=fn_al_tt_3): |
||||
The Amazon Original Series draws from unprecedented access to more than 17,000 |
||||
hours of footage and over 2,600 scrapbooks from Hefner's personal archives, |
||||
chronicling the life of an American icon and the history of the brand he |
||||
created. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=1) }} |
||||
|
||||
A series about Hugh Hefner, creator of the "Playboy" magazine. And, more than |
||||
than, a series *for* Hugh Hefner. |
||||
|
||||
One sided documentary/docuseries is not something new, but I can remember |
||||
something so blatantly for the subject like this before. |
||||
|
||||
Oh sure, Hefner came with an idea for a entering-adulthood-male magazine and |
||||
managed to interview some important personalities, give tips on wines and music |
||||
and clothing. And have naked women on them. |
||||
|
||||
But, oh look, Playboy interviews Malcolm X, look like progressive they are! Oh, |
||||
look, they are showing a black woman naked on their pages! Oh, look, Penthouse |
||||
shows up, showing more risqué content, but Playboy won't do that with their |
||||
women, 'cause they are not about this. Oh no, poor Hefner is being attacked by |
||||
feminists for showing women as objects, and he can't understand, 'cause he |
||||
feels he's liberating and empowering them! |
||||
|
||||
(Although I reckon feminists are right on this one, one can't stop thinking how |
||||
Playboy also treated men as objects: buy this, drink that, listen to this; |
||||
otherwise, you're not cool. Not in the same proportion, I understand, but |
||||
still...) |
||||
|
||||
Oh, and Hefner? Focused on his business and not his (first) family, but that's |
||||
a problem with the way he was raised, not his. Oh, bad things, Hefner divorce, |
||||
but they are still friends. But fret not, one model caught his eyes and BLAM! |
||||
Love at the first sight! But it didn't last. Poor Hefner. But oh look, another |
||||
model! Another love at first sight! They are really meant to be together. |
||||
Except they don't 'cause she turned singer and he went to have afairs. How can |
||||
Hefner be happy if there isn't a woman near him? But don't be sad, they are |
||||
still friends. ANOTHER model caught his eye! They immediately fall in love. And |
||||
it lasts till they divorce, but hey, there are still friends! Another model! |
||||
(Rinse, repeat). |
||||
|
||||
The love life of Hefner is one of the things that made me really pissed. He |
||||
openly admits he can't be alone, his affairs are sidelined, ex-wifes always say |
||||
he's so loving, just *one* admits she didn't like that he wanted an open |
||||
marriage for him and not for her and one you can clearly see that she does not |
||||
want to have Hef around, looks annoyed in the filming, but the narration said |
||||
they divorce and are "friends". |
||||
|
||||
This is the kind of thing that push a documentary down. There are no downsides |
||||
of Hefner: He's loving, he's successful and he got ideas. Things he did wrong? |
||||
No, no things wrong, he's perfect! |
||||
|
||||
The series is interesting around the initial episodes, showing the steps in the |
||||
creation of the Playboy magazine. But then it gets into this "social aspect" of |
||||
the magazine, and doesn't pip a thing about Hefner affairs, and it gets |
||||
annoying as fuck. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue