diff --git a/content/reviews/books/88-days-to-any-goal.md b/content/reviews/books/88-days-to-any-goal.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bea9070
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/reviews/books/88-days-to-any-goal.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
++++
+title = "88 Days to Any Goal - Rolland Roberts"
+date = 2020-02-20
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["books", "reviews", "self-help", "rolland roberts"]
++++
+
+[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40597273-the-90-day-promise):
+No summary.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+{{ stars(stars=1) }}
+
+A whole "book" for something that is 5 (badly explained) bullet points. And a
+lot of "THIS THING IS GREAT!"
+
+Want to lose weight? If you do the 88 day promise, you'll become weightless!
+
+Want to make more money? With the 88 day promise, you'll be richer than Jeff
+Bezos!
+
+I did the 88 day promise for my campaign and almost got elected as king of the
+world.
+
+Want to get impervious to bullets? All you need is the 88 day promise!
+
+A young Kal-El once decided to become stronger and, in 88 days, he was
+Superman!
+
+Jokes apart, there is very little information about what the heck the 88 day
+promise is. Just focusing on something for 88 day is enough? Can I focus on
+becoming impervious to bullets? Any goal is valid? How to proceed, just set a
+goal and that's it?
+
+No, it's not. There is a "first week, you take a time out". Suuuuure, I'll
+stop working for a whole week to recover my energies and then I'll focus for 2
+weeks and take another week out for recharging.
+
+Honestly, I felt like reading some very long ad for snake oil.
diff --git a/content/reviews/books/reactive-microservices-architecture.md b/content/reviews/books/reactive-microservices-architecture.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fcfe9a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/reviews/books/reactive-microservices-architecture.md
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
++++
+title = "Reactive Microservices Architecture - Jonas Bonér"
+date = 2020-02-20
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["books", "reviews", "it", "microservices", "jonas boner"]
++++
+
+[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29630482-reactive-microservices-architecture):
+Still chugging along with a monolithic enterprise system that’s difficult to
+scale and maintain, and even harder to understand? In this concise report,
+Lightbend CTO Jonas Bonér explains why microservice-based architecture that
+consists of small, independent services is far more flexible than the
+traditional all-in-one systems that continue to dominate today’s enterprise
+landscape.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+{{ stars(stars=1) }}
+
+Not actually a "book" per se, but more like a paper -- the author even
+mentions it is a paper.
+
+Now, is it a good paper? Well... Thing is, easy-to-explain concepts, like
+"Sagas", take a long discussion about them, but hard-to-explain, like the CAP
+theorem, make just some short explanations. And this is bad; things that
+really need more explanation do not and are just glossed over; things that you
+can get right out of the bad, do not. Also, some parts put a lot of footnotes
+and assume the reader will read the footnote, which is bad, 'cause if you let
+it to read later, you won't totally grasp what it means.
+
+Also, there is one serious problem: Although it does a good discussion about
+microservices, there is is very little explanation on what the reactive
+microservice differs from normal microservices.
+
+It's more interesting for the footnotes, which have links to the real content,
+than the content of the paper.