Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "21st Century Robot: The Dr. Simon Egerton Stories - Brian David Johnson" |
||||||
|
date = 2020-07-04 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "david johnson", "robotics", "it", "2 stars"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16087659-21st-century-robot): |
||||||
|
When companies develop a new technology, do they ask how it might affect the |
||||||
|
people who will actually use it? That, more or less, sums up Brian David |
||||||
|
Johnson's duties as Intel's futurist-in-residence. In this fascinating book, |
||||||
|
Johnson provides a collection of science fiction prototyping stories that |
||||||
|
attempt to answer the question. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is a hard book to read. Not due its writing style or large paragraphs of |
||||||
|
something of the kind, but because you have no idea what what is real and what |
||||||
|
is not. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are some stories about the "21st Century Robot Foundation", which is a |
||||||
|
foundation to give free, open source access to robot designs and code. Problem |
||||||
|
is, some of those are interleaved with fiction stories that has a character of |
||||||
|
the same name of someone in the foundation and then you never know if that's a |
||||||
|
cool extended thingy, actual coincidence or just plain... laziness (although I |
||||||
|
reckon that's a strong word for this). |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are some things that pissed me off. For example, saying "the robot brain |
||||||
|
is the hardware and software, what we call artificial intelligence, or AI". AI |
||||||
|
is way more than just hardware and software, you have to _train_ something to |
||||||
|
make it an AI, or it is just a bunch of reactive code with not actual |
||||||
|
"intelligence". Maybe it was dumbed down to reach the general population |
||||||
|
instead of going with proper terms, but it just annoys people that _do_ know. |
||||||
|
And talking about "apps to extend the robot personality" also seems a bit |
||||||
|
far-fetched in how AI works. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So, maybe the idea is great and all, but ideas without backing facts are just |
||||||
|
dreams. And for someone running a foundation, lacking the facts feels... |
||||||
|
weird. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue