New book review: Microservices In Action

content/reviews/books/microservices-in-action.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
++++
+title = "Microservices In Action - Morgan Bruce"
+date = 2019-08-13
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["books", "en-au", "reviews", "microservices", "morgan bruce"]
++++
+
+[GoodReads summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36579817-microservices-in-action):
+Microservices in Action is a practical book about building and deploying
+microservice-based applications. Written for developers and architects with a
+solid grasp of service-oriented development, it tackles the challenge of
+putting microservices into production. You'll begin with an in-depth overview
+of microservice design principles, building on your knowledge of traditional
+systems. Then, you'll start creating a reliable road to production. You'll
+explore examples using Kubernetes, Docker, and Google Container Engine as you
+learn to build clusters and maintain them after deployment. Throughout this
+rich, experience-driven book, you'll move through real-world use cases
+including a continuous delivery pipeline, production monitoring, and practical
+techniques for scaling and maintaining a healthy system.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+{{ stars(stars=2) }}
+
+For an "In Action" title, there is very little "Action" going on. Not that the
+book lacks information: There is plenty of theoretical information, although a
+lot is hidden in "cohesive" adjectives: "If you do this, the service will not
+be cohesive", "doing so will make it more cohesive"... and what the author
+means by "cohesive" is never explained -- I'd ask the author to replace every
+reference to cohesive with a proper explanation.
+
+Also, there are a lot of images. Not that images by themselves is bad, but when
+they are used for the obvious, it really irks me -- specially 'cause I read
+those books on a "black background with white letters" and images do not fit
+that properly, using a white background that usually just hurts my eyes. And by
+"used for the obvious", there are images follow the description of "A and B
+communicate with C" and a large image showing "A --> C <-- B"; was that really
+necessary?
+
+The intro says the code is in Python, and that was something that I'd really
+like to see. There is very little code in this book and the parts shown are
+basically "look at this library" instead of focusing on what it really does; a
+library for retrying is nice and all, but would it be so hard to write the
+code, even if that code would be somewhat longer, to show the point you're
+trying to make instead of being just an example of a library?
+
+Speaking of code, there is also a long discussion about deploying
+microservices, which is a good thing, but the author decided that it would use
+Google Cloud Platform and every single explanation focuses more on how to
+deploy on GCP instead of actually discussing deployment.