From f2b58001be89172faab462bd2c9dda0b91c49ba1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julio Biason Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:18:38 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Book Review: Creating Interfaces With Bulma --- .../books/creating-interfaces-with-bulma.md | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 content/reviews/books/creating-interfaces-with-bulma.md diff --git a/content/reviews/books/creating-interfaces-with-bulma.md b/content/reviews/books/creating-interfaces-with-bulma.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3ae47ee --- /dev/null +++ b/content/reviews/books/creating-interfaces-with-bulma.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ ++++ +title = "Creating Interfaces with Bulma - Jeremy Thomas, Oleksii Potiekhin, Mikko Lauhakari, Aslam Shah, Dave Berning" +date = 2020-01-20 + +[taxonomies] +tags = ["books", "reviews", "bulma", "it"] ++++ + +[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38473029-creating-interfaces-with-bulma): +This book is a step-by-step guide that will teach how to build a web interface +from scratch using Bulma. + + + +{{ stars(stars=2) }} + +Everybody is looking for that most awesome, small CSS framework, that will +solve all your problems. Is Bulma this framework? Well, I'm not sure. + +It's not that the book doesn't show what the framework can do, it's just that +the examples seem really without any checking: Sometimes fields are surrounded +by one "field" div, sometimes they are surrounded by "column" (a normal grid +component) and sometimes they are surrounded by two "field" divs. Why? Which +one is the right way? It is a problem with the framework or a problem with the +book? + +Also, there is a weird example of just writing templates with no explanation +on why: Why one should replace "6 books" to "3 customers"? Does that change +anything? (It does not, I do understand the why doing it, but there is no +explanation that you're doing it just to show how things will look like.) + +Also also, there is some serious problem with the images in the ePub version: +It says something but it shows a copy of a previous image. Surely, you get +what they meant by some template changes in a way that you don't need to see +the results, but still...