You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
118 lines
4.9 KiB
118 lines
4.9 KiB
<!DOCTYPE html> |
|
<html lang="en"> |
|
<head> |
|
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"> |
|
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> |
|
|
|
<!-- Enable responsiveness on mobile devices--> |
|
<!-- viewport-fit=cover is to support iPhone X rounded corners and notch in landscape--> |
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1, viewport-fit=cover"> |
|
|
|
<title>Julio Biason .Me 4.3</title> |
|
|
|
<!-- CSS --> |
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/print.css" media="print"> |
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/poole.css"> |
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/hyde.css"> |
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=PT+Sans:400,400italic,700|Abril+Fatface"> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</head> |
|
|
|
<body class=" "> |
|
|
|
<div class="sidebar"> |
|
<div class="container sidebar-sticky"> |
|
<div class="sidebar-about"> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me"><h1>Julio Biason .Me 4.3</h1></a> |
|
|
|
<p class="lead">Old school dev living in a 2.0 dev world</p> |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
<ul class="sidebar-nav"> |
|
|
|
|
|
<li class="sidebar-nav-item"><a href="/">English</a></li> |
|
|
|
<li class="sidebar-nav-item"><a href="/pt">Português</a></li> |
|
|
|
<li class="sidebar-nav-item"><a href="/tags">Tags (EN)</a></li> |
|
|
|
<li class="sidebar-nav-item"><a href="/pt/tags">Tags (PT)</a></li> |
|
|
|
|
|
</ul> |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="content container"> |
|
|
|
<div class="post"> |
|
<h1 class="post-title">The Where, the Why, and the How: 75 Artists Illustrate Wondrous Mysteries of Science - Matt LaMothe, Julia Rothman, Jenny Volvovski, David Macaulay</h1> |
|
<span class="post-date"> |
|
2019-02-17 |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/books/">#books</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/reviews/">#reviews</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/science/">#science</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/illutations/">#illutations</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/matt-lamothe/">#matt lamothe</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/julia-rothman/">#julia rothman</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/jenny-volvovski/">#jenny volvovski</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/david-macaulay/">#david macaulay</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/stars-3/">#stars:3</a> |
|
|
|
<a href="https://blog.juliobiason.me/tags/published-2012/">#published:2012</a> |
|
|
|
</span> |
|
<p><a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/14553766-the-where-the-why-and-the-how">GoodReads Summary</a>: |
|
A science book like no other, The Where, the Why, and the How turns loose 75 of |
|
today's hottest artists onto life's vast questions, from how we got here to |
|
where we are going. Inside these pages some of the biggest (and smallest) |
|
mysteries of the natural world are explained in essays by real working |
|
scientists, which are then illustrated by artists given free rein to be as |
|
literal or as imaginative as they like. The result is a celebration of the |
|
wonder that inspires every new discovery. Featuring work by such contemporary |
|
luminaries as Lisa Congdon, Jen Corace, Neil Farber, Susie Ghahremani, |
|
Jeremyville, and many more, this is a work of scientific and artistic |
|
exploration to pique the interest of both the intellectually and imaginatively |
|
curious.</p> |
|
<span id="continue-reading"></span><div> |
|
★★★☆☆ |
|
</div> |
|
<p>(This is getting quite common on my reviews but) This is a weird book.</p> |
|
<p>Now, don't get me wrong: The idea the title gives is that they are going to |
|
give you the where, the why and the how, but they actually mean the questions |
|
"where", "why" and "how". A lot of the answers is, basically, "we don't know |
|
yet" -- which, by the way, is completely fine, specially when dealing with |
|
proper science.</p> |
|
<p>Also, the questions are not really "trivia"-like: they go more deep than simply |
|
"Why are plants green?" and the like. And, because you have no certain |
|
questions, it gets even more nerd-like -- which, again, is completely fine.</p> |
|
<p>(Also, the illustrations: meh) </p> |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
</body> |
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
|