The source content for blog.juliobiason.me
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

2.1 KiB

+++ title = "Powers (Annals of the Western Shore, #3) - Ursula K. Le Guin" date = 2018-05-27 updated = 2021-02-12

[taxonomies] tags = ["books", "ursula k. le guin", "reviews", "annals of the western shore", "fantasy", "stars:5", "published:2007"] +++

GoodReads Summary: Young Gav can remember the page of a book after seeing it once, and, inexplicably, he sometimes "remembers" things that are going to happen in the future. As a loyal slave, he must keep these powers secret, but when a terrible tragedy occurs, Gav, blinded by grief, flees the only world he has ever known.

{{ stars(stars=5) }}

"The story of a boy becoming a man."

Or "The story of a slave becoming a freeman."

Or "The story of a man traveling across its country."

All those could serve as a quick description of the story. And all of them would be, at least, a bit wrong.

Because it's not just one of those. It's all of those. And a bit more.

At first, I was quite disappointed 'cause the "Powers" at the title are mentioned very early and then... nothing. There is a lot of going back and forth (a few transitions are a bit weird, like suddenly the story being a letter to the protagonist's wife) and you keep thinking "Were the heck is this going on?" And then, suddenly, you keep reading a bit more because you want to see a thread closed, and then read more, and more, and more... It's quite the same feeling I got from Changing Planes, although the story here is way more complex (not quite hard, as Changing Planes is a bunch of separate stories instead of the continuous story of a slave who runs away, make friends, finds his people, in a span of 10 or so years).

One of the things that Le Guin impresses me is how the way she describes things approaches the way Isaac Asimov does: Describes the very minimum necessary for the reader to understand why the characters are doing something, and let their imagination soar with the rest. It's quite different from Arthur C Clarke, which likes to over describe stuff.

In the end, it was a story that I was mostly uninterested at first but that deeply moved me in the very end.