You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
48 lines
2.2 KiB
48 lines
2.2 KiB
4 years ago
|
+++
|
||
|
title = "The Dragons of Dorcastle - Jack Campbell"
|
||
|
date = 2021-04-13
|
||
|
|
||
|
[taxonomies]
|
||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "books:2021", "fantasy", "jack campbell",
|
||
|
"the pillars of reality", "published:2014"]
|
||
|
+++
|
||
|
|
||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23379245-the-dragons-of-dorcastle):
|
||
|
For centuries, the two Great Guilds have controlled the world of Dematr. The
|
||
|
Mechanics and the Mages have been bitter rivals, agreeing only on the need to
|
||
|
keep the world they rule from changing. But now a Storm approaches, one that
|
||
|
could sweep away everything that humans have built. Only one person has any
|
||
|
chance of uniting enough of the world behind her to stop the Storm, but the
|
||
|
Great Guilds and many others will stop at nothing to defeat her.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- more -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Before anything else, let me say that I really enjoyed the way the book was
|
||
|
written: It is accessible, easy to read, easy to digest and, well, fun.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I also enjoyed the setting: A place where magic exists, but in which technology
|
||
|
wasn't ignored due this. So you have pistols, rifles, even cell phones, but
|
||
|
people that can make things burn and go through walls with the power of their
|
||
|
minds.
|
||
|
|
||
|
What I didn't like, though, was the way the relationship between the two main
|
||
|
characters evolve. It feels a bit forced and not something that develops
|
||
|
naturally. Also, one of the characters seem only to mirror the other (there are
|
||
|
reasons for this in the story, which I'm trying really hard not to spoil), so
|
||
|
it's not like they are really feeling that, they are more like mirror the
|
||
|
feelings of the other -- which, again, feels forced.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Also, I have some trouble with the pacing. You're reading a tense discussion,
|
||
|
with blatant disregard of one of the character's opinion, and then it cuts to
|
||
|
some memory or internal thought for 3 or 4 paragraphs, and then you return to
|
||
|
the same discussion. I see no problem in things like when the plot is just slow,
|
||
|
so you can give some character building at that point, but in the middle of a
|
||
|
heated discussion? The whole tension just breaks and it feels like the
|
||
|
discussion is not that tense anyway -- so, no repercussions, which isn't what
|
||
|
actually happens.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But is isn't a bad book, and it sets a whole universe for exploration in the
|
||
|
next books.
|