Browse Source

Book review: Dragons of Dorcastle

master 20210413
Julio Biason 4 years ago
parent
commit
50d12cd382
  1. 47
      content/reviews/books/dragons-of-dorcastle.md

47
content/reviews/books/dragons-of-dorcastle.md

@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+++
title = "The Dragons of Dorcastle - Jack Campbell"
date = 2021-04-13
[taxonomies]
tags = ["books", "reviews", "books:2021", "fantasy", "jack campbell",
"the pillars of reality", "published:2014"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23379245-the-dragons-of-dorcastle):
For centuries, the two Great Guilds have controlled the world of Dematr. The
Mechanics and the Mages have been bitter rivals, agreeing only on the need to
keep the world they rule from changing. But now a Storm approaches, one that
could sweep away everything that humans have built. Only one person has any
chance of uniting enough of the world behind her to stop the Storm, but the
Great Guilds and many others will stop at nothing to defeat her.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=4) }}
Before anything else, let me say that I really enjoyed the way the book was
written: It is accessible, easy to read, easy to digest and, well, fun.
I also enjoyed the setting: A place where magic exists, but in which technology
wasn't ignored due this. So you have pistols, rifles, even cell phones, but
people that can make things burn and go through walls with the power of their
minds.
What I didn't like, though, was the way the relationship between the two main
characters evolve. It feels a bit forced and not something that develops
naturally. Also, one of the characters seem only to mirror the other (there are
reasons for this in the story, which I'm trying really hard not to spoil), so
it's not like they are really feeling that, they are more like mirror the
feelings of the other -- which, again, feels forced.
Also, I have some trouble with the pacing. You're reading a tense discussion,
with blatant disregard of one of the character's opinion, and then it cuts to
some memory or internal thought for 3 or 4 paragraphs, and then you return to
the same discussion. I see no problem in things like when the plot is just slow,
so you can give some character building at that point, but in the middle of a
heated discussion? The whole tension just breaks and it feels like the
discussion is not that tense anyway -- so, no repercussions, which isn't what
actually happens.
But is isn't a bad book, and it sets a whole universe for exploration in the
next books.
Loading…
Cancel
Save