Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 47 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "The Dragons of Dorcastle - Jack Campbell" |
||||
date = 2021-04-13 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["books", "reviews", "books:2021", "fantasy", "jack campbell", |
||||
"the pillars of reality", "published:2014"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23379245-the-dragons-of-dorcastle): |
||||
For centuries, the two Great Guilds have controlled the world of Dematr. The |
||||
Mechanics and the Mages have been bitter rivals, agreeing only on the need to |
||||
keep the world they rule from changing. But now a Storm approaches, one that |
||||
could sweep away everything that humans have built. Only one person has any |
||||
chance of uniting enough of the world behind her to stop the Storm, but the |
||||
Great Guilds and many others will stop at nothing to defeat her. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=4) }} |
||||
|
||||
Before anything else, let me say that I really enjoyed the way the book was |
||||
written: It is accessible, easy to read, easy to digest and, well, fun. |
||||
|
||||
I also enjoyed the setting: A place where magic exists, but in which technology |
||||
wasn't ignored due this. So you have pistols, rifles, even cell phones, but |
||||
people that can make things burn and go through walls with the power of their |
||||
minds. |
||||
|
||||
What I didn't like, though, was the way the relationship between the two main |
||||
characters evolve. It feels a bit forced and not something that develops |
||||
naturally. Also, one of the characters seem only to mirror the other (there are |
||||
reasons for this in the story, which I'm trying really hard not to spoil), so |
||||
it's not like they are really feeling that, they are more like mirror the |
||||
feelings of the other -- which, again, feels forced. |
||||
|
||||
Also, I have some trouble with the pacing. You're reading a tense discussion, |
||||
with blatant disregard of one of the character's opinion, and then it cuts to |
||||
some memory or internal thought for 3 or 4 paragraphs, and then you return to |
||||
the same discussion. I see no problem in things like when the plot is just slow, |
||||
so you can give some character building at that point, but in the middle of a |
||||
heated discussion? The whole tension just breaks and it feels like the |
||||
discussion is not that tense anyway -- so, no repercussions, which isn't what |
||||
actually happens. |
||||
|
||||
But is isn't a bad book, and it sets a whole universe for exploration in the |
||||
next books. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue