Julio Biason
6 years ago
1 changed files with 56 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Why Mixing Spaces and Tabs IS a Big Deal" |
||||||
|
date = 2016-12-15 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
category = "code" |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["tabs", "spaces", "clean code", "editors"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Why something so small is actually a big deal. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reading Reddit comments about [How terrible code gets written by perfectly |
||||||
|
sane people](https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/5gc871/how_terrible_code_gets_written_by_perfectly_sane/) |
||||||
|
when I read this comment: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> spaces/tabs for indentation |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Is this a joke? I've been programming professionally from 2008 and I've not |
||||||
|
> yet found an actual case where this was an actual problem. The code looks |
||||||
|
> the same on everyone's screen if you set tab length in the editor to same |
||||||
|
> as the amount of spaces in your indentation. It would take seconds to fix |
||||||
|
> this :) I've never seen a tabs vs spaces argument go anywhere. It's such a |
||||||
|
> dumb thing to complain about. Maybe because I'm young I don't have |
||||||
|
> experience of bad code editors of old days but it's 2016 now. It's not a |
||||||
|
> big deal anymore. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Unfortunately, I lost the time to properly reply to this comment, but here it |
||||||
|
goes: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, it *isn't* a joke. If you've read [Clean Code](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3735293-clean-code?from_search=true), |
||||||
|
you'd see that, at some point, Uncle Bob mentions that there isn't an actual |
||||||
|
experiment about it, but his team personally found that a programmer that cares about |
||||||
|
consistency and follows coding standards are prone to write less buggy code. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I get what he means: If someone cares about the small stuff, |
||||||
|
they also care about the big stuff. It doesn't mean that people that ignore |
||||||
|
coding standards (and the difference between using tabs and using spaces) |
||||||
|
doesn't care about the big stuff; but on my own experience in those 28 |
||||||
|
years in the field proved the opposite: people who cared about |
||||||
|
"putting the code at the door" without worrying about following coding standards |
||||||
|
(and we can add tabs vs spaces here), proper code documentation, |
||||||
|
separation of concerns, a good level of abstraction, tend to write |
||||||
|
horrible/unmaintable code. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*This* is why mixed spaces/tabs is bad: it means that whoever didn't care enough |
||||||
|
with something so small as the coding standard, probably didn't care |
||||||
|
about the bigger stuff. Their only worry was to deliever stuff, no matter |
||||||
|
what. "And no matter what" usually results in terrible code. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So, while not an "actual problem", it is an indicator that something really |
||||||
|
terrible is going on. So, no, it isn't a joke and yes, it is a big deal. And |
||||||
|
it has absolutely nothing to do with "bad code editors", it's a problem with |
||||||
|
"bad coders". |
Loading…
Reference in new issue