Julio Biason
5 years ago
2 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "Creating Interfaces with Bulma - Jeremy Thomas, Oleksii Potiekhin, Mikko Lauhakari, Aslam Shah, Dave Berning" |
||||
date = 2020-01-20 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["books", "reviews", "bulma", "it"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38473029-creating-interfaces-with-bulma): |
||||
This book is a step-by-step guide that will teach how to build a web interface |
||||
from scratch using Bulma. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||
|
||||
Everybody is looking for that most awesome, small CSS framework, that will |
||||
solve all your problems. Is Bulma this framework? Well, I'm not sure. |
||||
|
||||
It's not that the book doesn't show what the framework can do, it's just that |
||||
the examples seem really without any checking: Sometimes fields are surrounded |
||||
by one "field" div, sometimes they are surrounded by "column" (a normal grid |
||||
component) and sometimes they are surrounded by two "field" divs. Why? Which |
||||
one is the right way? It is a problem with the framework or a problem with the |
||||
book? |
||||
|
||||
Also, there is a weird example of just writing templates with no explanation |
||||
on why: Why one should replace "6 books" to "3 customers"? Does that change |
||||
anything? (It does not, I do understand the why doing it, but there is no |
||||
explanation that you're doing it just to show how things will look like.) |
||||
|
||||
Also also, there is some serious problem with the images in the ePub version: |
||||
It says something but it shows a copy of a previous image. Surely, you get |
||||
what they meant by some template changes in a way that you don't need to see |
||||
the results, but still... |
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "The Flight of the Eisenstein - James Swallow" |
||||
date = 2020-01-17 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["books", "reviews", "horus heresy", "warhammer 40000", "sci", "james swallow"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/80155.The_Flight_of_the_Eisenstein): |
||||
Having witnessed the events on Istvaan III, Deathguard Captain Garro seizes a |
||||
ship and heads to Terra to warn the Emperor of Horus's treachery. But the |
||||
fleeing Eisenstein is damaged by enemy fire, and becomes stranded in the warp. |
||||
Can Garro and his men survive the depredations of Chaos and get his warning to |
||||
Terra in time? |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=1) }} |
||||
|
||||
How do you tell a following story that takes over from another one, one that |
||||
feels somewhat complete, one that, even when discussing several events, have |
||||
at least one that goes to conclusion? One solution is to continue the story |
||||
from the point the previous one completed, but one could try to push the |
||||
story further by picking one of those events and showing another point of |
||||
view of something readers already know how it will end, being careful to not |
||||
build any suspense on what will happen, 'cause the reader knows what it will |
||||
end and you end up with just a bunch of text that it is just boring as heck |
||||
to read. |
||||
|
||||
Another thing one should take care is to not build long sentences that just |
||||
keeps going on and on that add very little except burn the reader time, like |
||||
pointing out that long sentences burn the reader time, instead of going |
||||
straight to the point, avoiding running around the point, with no care about |
||||
that amount of information per sentence you're adding. |
||||
|
||||
And, still, you get all those here. |
||||
|
||||
Indeed, from one of the several events that happened in "Galaxy in Flames", |
||||
the author picked on of the things that happens in the sidelines (which get |
||||
some spotlight, in the end) and try to build a whole story out of it, kind |
||||
like "Shadow of the Giant" is built on the side-story of Ender's Game. But |
||||
while Shadow of the Giant, while still entangled with Ender's Game, have very |
||||
small touching points, about 60% is exactly what happened in "Galaxy in |
||||
Flames". Worse, with so much touching surface, the author decided to create on |
||||
suspense on what will happen to the nominal ship: Will it survive the attack |
||||
from Horus forces? Will they manage to get away? OF COURSE IT WILL, Galaxy in |
||||
Flames told us that they escape, so why are you making a huge fuss about the |
||||
amount of damage they are taking, like they won't be able to take away? |
||||
|
||||
And there is also the long sentences that provide very little information with |
||||
a huge amount of words, which completely break the speed of the story. Think |
||||
about the longest, most boring line, with the most duplicate information, in |
||||
the middle of a battle. How would you feel about the battle speed? |
||||
|
||||
Honestly, it's not that "Horus Heresy" is a masterpiece of literature, but the |
||||
series could surely survive without this book. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue