Julio Biason
3 years ago
1 changed files with 37 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Loki (2021)" |
||||||
|
date = 2021-08-26 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["series", "reviews", "series:2021", "stars:3"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Wikipdia Summary](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki_(TV_series)): The series |
||||||
|
takes place after the events of the film Avengers: Endgame (2019), in which an |
||||||
|
alternate version of Loki created a new timeline. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=3) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What do you make when a villain actually gets popular and the person in the part |
||||||
|
is actually liked? You turn it into a hero! |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Sure, it worked wonders for Catwoman. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But yeah, this time is Loki. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the action of taking the tesseract in "Endgame", Loki is now under arrest by |
||||||
|
some time agency, which you never heard before, for "breaking the timeline". Of |
||||||
|
course, the Avengers, when they broke the timeline, it was expected, so they are |
||||||
|
Ok, but Loki is not. So, what happens? The agency hires Loki to take the other |
||||||
|
representations of Loki, so now Loki is in to save the universe. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So, while "Falcon and the Winter Soldier" tracked the problem with the way USA |
||||||
|
deals with black people (including black soldiers) and "Wandavision" tracked the |
||||||
|
problem of dealing with loss, "Loki" deals with... the idea of turning a villain |
||||||
|
into a hero for money. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Not that Tom Hiddleston let his acting down, or even Owen Wilson, but the fact |
||||||
|
that the series was created purely to take on the popularity of Hiddleston |
||||||
|
character is a major let down. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue