Browse Source

Merge branch 'release/20200220'

master 20200220
Julio Biason 5 years ago
parent
commit
b1516bfc44
  1. 41
      content/reviews/books/88-days-to-any-goal.md
  2. 37
      content/reviews/books/reactive-microservices-architecture.md

41
content/reviews/books/88-days-to-any-goal.md

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+++
title = "88 Days to Any Goal - Rolland Roberts"
date = 2020-02-20
[taxonomies]
tags = ["books", "reviews", "self-help", "rolland roberts"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40597273-the-90-day-promise):
No summary.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=1) }}
A whole "book" for something that is 5 (badly explained) bullet points. And a
lot of "THIS THING IS GREAT!"
Want to lose weight? If you do the 88 day promise, you'll become weightless!
Want to make more money? With the 88 day promise, you'll be richer than Jeff
Bezos!
I did the 88 day promise for my campaign and almost got elected as king of the
world.
Want to get impervious to bullets? All you need is the 88 day promise!
A young Kal-El once decided to become stronger and, in 88 days, he was
Superman!
Jokes apart, there is very little information about what the heck the 88 day
promise is. Just focusing on something for 88 day is enough? Can I focus on
becoming impervious to bullets? Any goal is valid? How to proceed, just set a
goal and that's it?
No, it's not. There is a "first week, you take a time out". Suuuuure, I'll
stop working for a whole week to recover my energies and then I'll focus for 2
weeks and take another week out for recharging.
Honestly, I felt like reading some very long ad for snake oil.

37
content/reviews/books/reactive-microservices-architecture.md

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+++
title = "Reactive Microservices Architecture - Jonas Bonér"
date = 2020-02-20
[taxonomies]
tags = ["books", "reviews", "it", "microservices", "jonas boner"]
+++
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29630482-reactive-microservices-architecture):
Still chugging along with a monolithic enterprise system that’s difficult to
scale and maintain, and even harder to understand? In this concise report,
Lightbend CTO Jonas Bonér explains why microservice-based architecture that
consists of small, independent services is far more flexible than the
traditional all-in-one systems that continue to dominate today’s enterprise
landscape.
<!-- more -->
{{ stars(stars=1) }}
Not actually a "book" per se, but more like a paper -- the author even
mentions it is a paper.
Now, is it a good paper? Well... Thing is, easy-to-explain concepts, like
"Sagas", take a long discussion about them, but hard-to-explain, like the CAP
theorem, make just some short explanations. And this is bad; things that
really need more explanation do not and are just glossed over; things that you
can get right out of the bad, do not. Also, some parts put a lot of footnotes
and assume the reader will read the footnote, which is bad, 'cause if you let
it to read later, you won't totally grasp what it means.
Also, there is one serious problem: Although it does a good discussion about
microservices, there is is very little explanation on what the reactive
microservice differs from normal microservices.
It's more interesting for the footnotes, which have links to the real content,
than the content of the paper.
Loading…
Cancel
Save