Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "21st Century Robot: The Dr. Simon Egerton Stories - Brian David Johnson" |
||||
date = 2020-07-04 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["books", "reviews", "david johnson", "robotics", "it", "2 stars"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16087659-21st-century-robot): |
||||
When companies develop a new technology, do they ask how it might affect the |
||||
people who will actually use it? That, more or less, sums up Brian David |
||||
Johnson's duties as Intel's futurist-in-residence. In this fascinating book, |
||||
Johnson provides a collection of science fiction prototyping stories that |
||||
attempt to answer the question. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=2) }} |
||||
|
||||
This is a hard book to read. Not due its writing style or large paragraphs of |
||||
something of the kind, but because you have no idea what what is real and what |
||||
is not. |
||||
|
||||
There are some stories about the "21st Century Robot Foundation", which is a |
||||
foundation to give free, open source access to robot designs and code. Problem |
||||
is, some of those are interleaved with fiction stories that has a character of |
||||
the same name of someone in the foundation and then you never know if that's a |
||||
cool extended thingy, actual coincidence or just plain... laziness (although I |
||||
reckon that's a strong word for this). |
||||
|
||||
There are some things that pissed me off. For example, saying "the robot brain |
||||
is the hardware and software, what we call artificial intelligence, or AI". AI |
||||
is way more than just hardware and software, you have to _train_ something to |
||||
make it an AI, or it is just a bunch of reactive code with not actual |
||||
"intelligence". Maybe it was dumbed down to reach the general population |
||||
instead of going with proper terms, but it just annoys people that _do_ know. |
||||
And talking about "apps to extend the robot personality" also seems a bit |
||||
far-fetched in how AI works. |
||||
|
||||
So, maybe the idea is great and all, but ideas without backing facts are just |
||||
dreams. And for someone running a foundation, lacking the facts feels... |
||||
weird. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue