New chapter: stupid bug list

content/books/things-i-learnt/_index.md

@@ -71,3 +71,4 @@ template = "section-contentless.html"
 	* [... Unless That Code Style Is The Google Code Style](google-code-style)
 * Personal
 	* [Companies Look For Specialists But Keep Generalists Longer](specialists)
+	* [Keep A List of Stupid Bugs That Took More Than 1 Hour To Solve](stupid-bugs-list)

content/books/things-i-learnt/specialists/index.md

@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ in C show up and guess who also knew C?
 
 [^1]: ... which led me into some sad times when I was working with Python.
 
-{{ chapters(prev_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/google-code-style", prev_chapter_title="... Unless That Code Style Is The Google Code Style") }}
+{{ chapters(prev_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/google-code-style", prev_chapter_title="... Unless That Code Style Is The Google Code Style", next_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/stupid-bugs-list", next_chapter_title="Keep A List of Stupid Bugs That Took More Than 1 Hour To Solve") }}

content/books/things-i-learnt/stupid-bugs-list/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
++++
+title = "Things I Learnt The Hard Way - Keep A List of Stupid Bugs That Took More Than 1 Hour To Solve"
+date = 2019-07-17
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["en-au", "books", "things i learnt", "lists", "stupid bugs"]
++++
+
+If it took you more than one hour for you to figure out what went wrong, it is
+a good idea to put it on list, 'cause these things have the tendency to appear
+again.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+I must admit that this is one thing that I should be doing, but I keep
+forgetting. The worst part: It usually takes me about an hour to figure out
+what went wrong, only to realize by the solution that I had the same problem
+(with the same solution) before and it took me about one hour to figure out
+what went wrong.
+
+If I just had a list of stupid bugs that took me about 1 hour or more to
+solve, I wouldn't be stuck for another hour figuring out what went wrong.
+
+{{ chapters(prev_chapter_link="/books/things-i-learnt/specialists", prev_chapter_title="Companies Look For Specialists But Keep Generalists Longer") }}