Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 83 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
+++ |
||||
title = "Concise Guide To Databases - Peter Lake, Paul Crowther" |
||||
date = 2021-02-10 |
||||
|
||||
[taxonomies] |
||||
tags = ["books", "reviews", "it", "books:2021", "published:2013", "peter lake", |
||||
"paul crowther"] |
||||
+++ |
||||
|
||||
[GoodReads |
||||
Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18475615-concise-guide-to-databases): |
||||
This easy-to-read textbook/reference presents a comprehensive introduction to |
||||
databases, opening with a concise history of databases and of data as an |
||||
organisational asset. As relational database management systems are no longer |
||||
the only database solution, the book takes a wider view of database technology, |
||||
encompassing big data, NoSQL, object and object-relational, and in-memory |
||||
databases. The text also examines the issues of scalability, availability, |
||||
performance and security encountered when building and running a database in the |
||||
real world. |
||||
|
||||
<!-- more --> |
||||
|
||||
{{ stars(stars=1) }} |
||||
|
||||
Let me get something out of my system straight away: This book needs some |
||||
**serious** proof-reading. The authors seem to have an aversion to commas, and |
||||
that makes reading some sentences really hard ("Is that an adjective or a noun? |
||||
Oh, heck, I though it was an adjective, and now things don't make sense; let me |
||||
read that again as a noun to see if that works.") There are a lot of repeat |
||||
content (three times there is a discussion on how HDD prices are falling, how |
||||
the price per megabyte is falling and how SSD is faster than HD). All the |
||||
abstracts, the first part of every chapter, are just some copy'n'paste from a |
||||
few phrases of the first part after the abstract. And there are "is in the a |
||||
Microsoft", "none encrypted protocol" and there is even a "[company] and there |
||||
product". And two paragraphs one-next-to-the-other have "OS" written in 3 |
||||
different ways ("o/s", "O/S" and "OS"). Oh, and there is no definitive style for |
||||
anything: Sometimes quotations would have a larger margin compared to the rest |
||||
of the text and sometimes they won't; all commands (including SQL queries and |
||||
related commands to be entered in databases) are all in the same font as the |
||||
rest of the text (with one single exception in the end of the book); sometimes |
||||
there are sub-sub-sections (like "14.4.1.1) and sometimes it just uses bold text |
||||
with no numeration. |
||||
|
||||
But, if the book was actually nice (and easy) to read, besides all that, does is |
||||
live to its title? No. |
||||
|
||||
Is it "Concise"? Well, not quite. The printed version is 300+ pages long, which |
||||
I could hardly call "concise". A lot of content could be removed with no affect |
||||
in the end, like the step-by-step explanation of all 5 levels of database |
||||
normalization (which is also arguable if that makes sense in a book that should |
||||
discuss databases), the explanation of XML (which is not arguable and feels |
||||
completely lost in a book about databases) and discussions on what to do when a |
||||
disk fails. |
||||
|
||||
Is it a "Guide"? Not quite. The book does explore (lightly) different databases, |
||||
but fails to point **where** each makes sense: What kind of data/database |
||||
structure makes sense in a relational database? What kind of data fits better on |
||||
a NoSQL database? When it makes sense to use Hadoop? |
||||
|
||||
Is it about "Databases"? That's where the book fails hard, in my opinion. Sure, |
||||
it talks about Oracle, and a bit about Mongo, and Oracle, and some about |
||||
Cassandra, and Oracle, and they even mention Hadoop. And then Oracle. It feels |
||||
like the whole book is just a huge propaganda on how to operate Oracle, how |
||||
Oracle tools work, and so on. Sure they talk about other databases, but when |
||||
every example is about Oracle, you have to wonder why. |
||||
|
||||
Another example of how the book leans towards Oracle: There is a single mention |
||||
to PostgreSQL, saying that it "is popular with personal computer users". Heck, |
||||
AWS RDS was launched 4 years prior to the publishing of this book and it already |
||||
had the PostgreSQL layer. Since early 2000s, every time someone asked "What |
||||
database should I use for my project?" there was at least one "PostgreSQL" |
||||
answer. But, since PostgreSQL is in direct competition with Oracle, you can see |
||||
why it is largely ignored. |
||||
|
||||
So, hard to read and doesn't fill the topic it proposes in its title. "7 |
||||
Databases in 7 Weeks" does a better job about being a Guide to Databases than |
||||
this. |
||||
|
||||
--- |
||||
|
||||
ISSN 1863-7310e-ISSN 2197-1781 |
||||
|
||||
ISBN 978-1-4471-5600-0e-ISBN 978-1-4471-5601-7 |
Loading…
Reference in new issue