some few adjustments

config.toml

@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ after_dark_menu = [
 after_dark_title = "JulioBiason.Net 4.0"
 
 hyde_links = [
-	{url = "/", name = "Home"},
+	{name = "Category: Book Reviews", url = "/reviews/books"},
+	{name = "Category: Code", url = "/code"},
+	{name = "Category: Reviews", url = "/reviews"},
+	{name = "Tags", url = "/tags"},
 ]
 hyde_reverse = true

content/code/_index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
++++
+title = "Code"
+transparent = true
++++

content/code/on-unittests-and-layers-2.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ about "Fast Test, Slow Test".
 <!-- more -->
 
 Just after posting about 
-[who one could see the layers through unit testing](./on-unittests-and-layers.md),
+[who one could see the layers through unit testing](./code/on-unittests-and-layers.md),
 I finally watched a video of Gary
 Bernhardt (of the "DestroyAllSoftware" fame) about "Fast Test, Slow Test":
 

content/reviews/_index.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 +++
 transparent = true
-titles = "Reviews"
+title = "Reviews"
 +++

content/reviews/books/in-the-beginning-science-faces-god-in-the-book-of-genesis.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 +++
-title = "In the Beginning . . .: Science Faces God in the Book of Genesis - Isaac Asimov"
+title = "In the Beginning...: Science Faces God in the Book of Genesis - Isaac Asimov"
 date = 2018-06-25
 
 category = "review"

content/reviews/books/learn-you-a-haskell-for-great-good.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
++++
+title = "Learn You a Haskell for Great Good! - Miran Lipovača"
+date = 2018-11-23
+
+category = "review"
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["books", "en-au", "miran lipovaca", "haskell"]
++++
+{{ stars(stars=2) }}
+
+I have mixed feelings about this book.
+
+It starts really really well, explaining how the language works. And then it
+falls on the trap of "functional programming" that, instead of focusing on what
+you can do with the language, it goes lengths talking about monads, monoids,
+functors and nondeterminism that you keep wondering why it is taking so long
+explaining function programming instead of focusing on what you can do and when
+you should use one.
+
+There is even a bad description of "don't do this because it will look horrible
+when you convert to this other form". Wondering if something will look horrible
+if you write the same thing in a different form should never be a deterrent for
+something.
+
+Also, there is the language. Surely, Haskell adds a missing point in Lisp,
+which are the types, but them it goes off the rails trying to remove
+parenthesis and the result is a mass of weird symbols, all representing the
+same thing. And you have, as I mentioned before, different forms to write the
+same code, which makes the language highly irregular, one trait that really
+pisses me off in programming languages. 

content/reviews/books/the-story-behind-the-extraordinary-history-behind-ordinary-objects.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
++++
+title = "The Story Behind: The Extraordinary History Behind Ordinary Objects - Emily Prokop"
+date = 2018-11-24
+
+category = "review"
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["en-au", "books", "reviews", "emily prokop"]
++++
+
+{{ stars(stars=4) }}
+
+One of the books from the "Trivia Champion" Humble Bundle. And yes, it belongs
+to a "Trivia Champion" bundle.
+
+The whole book consists on small stories about random objects: The smiley face,
+the revolver, the hydrant, the wipper, all consist in a small story behind it
+or some anecdote, like a campus on war due a water gun.
+
+The stories are small and funny.
+
+The only problem I had (and, again, personal problem) is that it is too
+American-centric. I mean, the whole war on a water gun mentions an American
+university; Dr Pepper is mostly unknown in Brazil; 90% of the people mentioned
+are American -- and, by the way, the little anecdote about the water gun has
+absolutely no relation to the creation of the product.