Julio Biason
6 years ago
3 changed files with 126 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Greek Mythology Explained: A Deeper Look at Classical Greek Lore and Myth - Marios Christou, David Ramenah" |
||||||
|
date = 2019-01-05 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["en-au", "book", "reviews", "greek mythology", "marios christou", "david ramenah"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/41822694-greek-mythology-explained): |
||||||
|
Greek mythology explored like never before. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fans of George R.R Martin’s A Song of Ice & Fire series and the Game of Thrones |
||||||
|
TV series will love Greek Mythology Explained, a unique retelling of Greek |
||||||
|
mythological tales featuring love, betrayal, murder and ruthless ambitions. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When I saw "Explained" in the title, I thought the explanations would point |
||||||
|
things in the stories that reflected things in the Greek society at the time. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But no, explanations are way more simpler than that. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For example, the mith of Odysseus and his voyage back home, starting when he |
||||||
|
has to choose between facing Scylla or Chyrabdis, one a monster of 6 heads and |
||||||
|
another a huge whirlpool. The explanation: "between a rock and hard place". I |
||||||
|
mean, it doesn't take much to realize that either option is terrible. You don't |
||||||
|
need explanation for that. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On the other hand, some explanations are, actually, explanations about the |
||||||
|
chosen story. Some characters in Greek mythology have different narrations for |
||||||
|
the same story -- for example, there are, according to the book, 6 different |
||||||
|
tales of Artemis and Orion, all with the same start, the same ending, but |
||||||
|
different content "in between". This is nice. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And, even if the explanations aren't a huge thing, the select stories are |
||||||
|
pretty good. |
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Modern Vim: Craft Your Development Environment with Vim 8 and Neovim - Drew Neil" |
||||||
|
date = 2018-12-29 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["en-au", "books", "reviews", "vim", "drew neil"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36517607-modern-vim): |
||||||
|
Turn Vim into a full-blown development environment using Vim 8’s new features |
||||||
|
and this sequel to the beloved bestseller Practical Vim. Integrate your editor |
||||||
|
with tools for building, testing, linting, indexing, and searching your |
||||||
|
codebase. Discover the future of Vim with Neovim: a fork of Vim that includes |
||||||
|
a built-in terminal emulator that will transform your workflow. Whether you |
||||||
|
choose to switch to Neovim or stick with Vim 8, you’ll be a better developer. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'll be honest and say that I did expect a bit more about this book. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is not a book talking about changes in the last few years in the VIM |
||||||
|
workflow; it's more about the changes in the ecosystem of VIM. So instead of |
||||||
|
focusing on new features (say, from last version and current version), it |
||||||
|
focuses a lot more on plugins. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Not that focusing on (recent) plugins is a bad thing: There were changes in the |
||||||
|
infrastructure of VIM that allowed the creation of more modern and flexible |
||||||
|
plugins and talking about them is a good thing. But, again, I expected a more |
||||||
|
focused book on VIM than plugins. If the title were "Craft your VIM environment |
||||||
|
on VIM 8 and Neovim", it would fit perfectly on what the book presents, for |
||||||
|
example. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In all, it's not a bad book, although it requires that you know VIM beforehand. |
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "Moon Shot: The Inside Story of America's Race to the Moon - Alan Shepard" |
||||||
|
date = 2018-12-28 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["en-us", "alan shepard", "book", "review", "nasa", "apollo"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37711959-moon-shot): |
||||||
|
The never-before-told story of the courage, dedication, and teamwork that made |
||||||
|
the journey to the moon possible--an intense human drama of the sacrifices and |
||||||
|
risks asked of a remarkable group of astronauts. Shepard and Slayton, part of |
||||||
|
the pioneering space program from the beginning, tell this fascinating inside |
||||||
|
story. 32 pages of photos. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=0) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm giving this book no stars because it deserves none. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
First of all, the writing style is terrible. At the very start, the way the |
||||||
|
author writes makes you wonder if this is really a book about history or if it |
||||||
|
is plain fiction. There are ways to write about historic events -- and I don't |
||||||
|
mean you can't go a little overboard while writing about it -- but the way the |
||||||
|
story is told is more akin to fiction than actual reporting of events. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Second, this is as "MURRICA!" as a book can get. All American events are |
||||||
|
described as passionate as possible, while Russian events -- you know, the guys |
||||||
|
who put a man in space before the US and who did a spacewalk before the US -- |
||||||
|
as described as plain as possible. This gets to the point that, at the first |
||||||
|
half of the book, events are timed after American successes and Russian |
||||||
|
failures; it gets to the incredible insensitive point when talking about Apollo |
||||||
|
15 and the moonbuggy and how it was easier to carry stuff on the moon compared |
||||||
|
to the Apollo 14 mission (which is probably the longest part of the book, even |
||||||
|
supplanting the Apollo 11, the first mission to reach the moon) and, oh, 3 |
||||||
|
Russians died a bit before -- mentioned as a simple "matter of fact" than an |
||||||
|
actual accident and something that shouldn't happen. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm not saying "Yeah, Russians are part of the Apollo mission" 'cause that |
||||||
|
would be stupid, but JFK said the space missions were a mission to humanity and |
||||||
|
even Neil Armstrong said reaching the moon was a giant leap for mankind, but |
||||||
|
this book takes "humanity" and throws out of the window. 'Cause the important |
||||||
|
stuff is that American win and Russians lose and fuck Russians, amirite? (That |
||||||
|
was sarcastic, in case you didn't noticed.) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And the last chapter is purely political instead of focusing on history. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the whole book was Alan Shepard telling his side of the history -- and |
||||||
|
focusing on *that* instead of going all the way to the points where |
||||||
|
Shepard had no interaction with -- then yeah, it could be a reasonably good |
||||||
|
book. But the way it is told, it's Alan Shepard story hidden in a bunch of |
||||||
|
other stuff. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue