Julio Biason
4 years ago
1 changed files with 47 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ |
|||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
title = "The Dragons of Dorcastle - Jack Campbell" |
||||||
|
date = 2021-04-13 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[taxonomies] |
||||||
|
tags = ["books", "reviews", "books:2021", "fantasy", "jack campbell", |
||||||
|
"the pillars of reality", "published:2014"] |
||||||
|
+++ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GoodReads Summary](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23379245-the-dragons-of-dorcastle): |
||||||
|
For centuries, the two Great Guilds have controlled the world of Dematr. The |
||||||
|
Mechanics and the Mages have been bitter rivals, agreeing only on the need to |
||||||
|
keep the world they rule from changing. But now a Storm approaches, one that |
||||||
|
could sweep away everything that humans have built. Only one person has any |
||||||
|
chance of uniting enough of the world behind her to stop the Storm, but the |
||||||
|
Great Guilds and many others will stop at nothing to defeat her. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more --> |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{ stars(stars=4) }} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Before anything else, let me say that I really enjoyed the way the book was |
||||||
|
written: It is accessible, easy to read, easy to digest and, well, fun. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I also enjoyed the setting: A place where magic exists, but in which technology |
||||||
|
wasn't ignored due this. So you have pistols, rifles, even cell phones, but |
||||||
|
people that can make things burn and go through walls with the power of their |
||||||
|
minds. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What I didn't like, though, was the way the relationship between the two main |
||||||
|
characters evolve. It feels a bit forced and not something that develops |
||||||
|
naturally. Also, one of the characters seem only to mirror the other (there are |
||||||
|
reasons for this in the story, which I'm trying really hard not to spoil), so |
||||||
|
it's not like they are really feeling that, they are more like mirror the |
||||||
|
feelings of the other -- which, again, feels forced. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Also, I have some trouble with the pacing. You're reading a tense discussion, |
||||||
|
with blatant disregard of one of the character's opinion, and then it cuts to |
||||||
|
some memory or internal thought for 3 or 4 paragraphs, and then you return to |
||||||
|
the same discussion. I see no problem in things like when the plot is just slow, |
||||||
|
so you can give some character building at that point, but in the middle of a |
||||||
|
heated discussion? The whole tension just breaks and it feels like the |
||||||
|
discussion is not that tense anyway -- so, no repercussions, which isn't what |
||||||
|
actually happens. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But is isn't a bad book, and it sets a whole universe for exploration in the |
||||||
|
next books. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue